Abstract

Review Article

Rare Locations of Plasma Cell Tumour: A Single-Centre Experience

Vladimir Prandjev, Donika Vezirska and Ivan Kindekov*

Published: 27 August, 2025 | Volume 9 - Issue 1 | Pages: 015-019

Extramedullary involvement, also known as Extramedullary Disease (EMD), represents a highly aggressive variant of plasma cell dyscrasias. It is characterised by the presence of plasma cell clones that proliferate independently of the bone marrow microenvironment. While EMD most commonly affects the skin and soft tissues, in cases of disease relapse, it may extend to internal organs, including the liver, kidneys, central nervous system, chest wall, pleura, and pericardium.
The reported incidence of EMD varies. A comprehensive review of the literature indicates that in newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, the incidence ranges from 0.5% to 4.5%. However, in relapsed or refractory MM, the incidence increases markedly, reaching between 3.4% and 14%. Prognosis remains poor, particularly when the paravertebral region is involved, as this often leads to vertebral body fractures that complicate treatment and worsen outcomes.
Current data on therapeutic responses are primarily based on retrospective studies. Therefore, prospective trials are needed to more accurately assess the efficacy of various treatment regimens. This study presents a cohort of patients with paravertebral plasma cell tumours, with a specific focus on tumour location, associated vertebral fractures, available treatment strategies, and clinical responses following induction therapy.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jhcr.1001036 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

Keywords:

Plasma cell dyscrasias; Paravertebral location; Therapy; Pathogenesis; Therapeutic response

References

  1. Bladé J, Fernández de Larrea C, Rosiñol L, Cibeira MT, Jiménez R, Powles R. Soft-tissue plasmacytomas in multiple myeloma: incidence, mechanisms of extramedullary spread, and treatment approach. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(28):3805–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.34.9290
  2. Liu Y, Jelloul F, Zhang Y, Bhavsar T, Ho C, Rao M, et al. Genetic Basis of Extramedullary Plasmablastic Transformation of Multiple Myeloma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44(6):838–48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001459
  3. Rosiñol L, Beksac M, Zamagni E, Van de Donk NWCJ, Anderson KC, Badros A, et al. Expert review on soft-tissue plasmacytomas in multiple myeloma: definition, disease assessment, and treatment considerations. Br J Haematol. 2021;194(3):496–507. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.17338
  4. Rosiñol L, Fernández de Larrea C, Bladé J. Extramedullary myeloma spread triggered by surgical procedures: an emerging entity?. Acta Haematol. 2014;132(1):36–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1159/000354833
  5. Chang H, Sloan S, Li D, Stewart AK. Multiple myeloma involving the central nervous system: high frequency of chromosome 17p13.1 (p53) deletions. Br J Haematol. 2004;127(3):280–4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05199.x
  6. López-Anglada L, Gutiérrez NC, García JL, Mateos MV, Flores T, San Miguel JF. P53 deletion may drive the clinical evolution and treatment response in multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol. 2010;84(4):359–61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01399.x
  7. Sheth N, Yeung J, Chang H. p53 nuclear accumulation is associated with extramedullary progression of multiple myeloma. Leuk Res. 2009;33(10):1357–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2009.01.010
  8. Besse L, Sedlarikova L, Greslikova H, Kupska R, Almasi M, Penka M, et al. Cytogenetics in multiple myeloma patients progressing into extramedullary disease. Eur J Haematol. 2016;97(1):93–100. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.12688
  9. Deng S, Xu Y, An G, Sui W, Zou D, Zhao Y, et al. Features of extramedullary disease of multiple myeloma: high frequency of p53 deletion and poor survival: a retrospective single-center study of 834 cases. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015;15(5):286–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2014.12.013
  10. Katodritou E, Gastari V, Verrou E, Hadjiaggelidou C, Varthaliti M, Georgiadou S, et al. Extramedullary (EMP) relapse in unusual locations in multiple myeloma: Is there an association with precedent thalidomide administration and a correlation of special biological features with treatment and outcome?. Leuk Res. 2009;33(8):1137–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2009.01.036
  11. Usmani SZ, Heuck C, Mitchell A, Szymonifka J, Nair B, Hoering A, et al. Extramedullary disease portends poor prognosis in multiple myeloma and is over-represented in high-risk disease even in the era of novel agents. Haematologica. 2012;97(11):1761–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2012.065698
  12. Pintoffl JP, Weisel K, Schulze M, Maksimovic O, Claussen CD, Kramer U, et al. Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography for characterization and monitoring of extramedullary myeloma: comparison with serologic data. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(10):1777–88. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.32.10.1777
  13. Cavo M, Terpos E, Nanni C, Moreau P, Lentzsch S, Zweegman S, et al. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: a consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(4):e206–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30189-4
  14. Montefusco V, Gay F, Spada S, De Paoli L, Di Raimondo F, Ribolla R, et al. Outcome of paraosseous extra-medullary disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with new drugs. Haematologica. 2020;105(1):193–200. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.219139
  15. Kraeber-Bodéré F, Zweegman S, Perrot A, Hulin C, Caillot D, Facon T, et al. Prognostic value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients from CASSIOPEIA: the CASSIOPET study. Haematologica. 2023;108(2):621–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.280051
  16. Gagelmann N, Eikema DJ, Iacobelli S, Koster L, Nahi H, Stoppa AM, et al. Impact of extramedullary disease in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: a study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT. Haematologica. 2018;103(5):890–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.178434
  17. Beksac M, Seval GC, Kanellias N, Coriu D, Rosiñol L, Ozet G, et al. A real-world multicenter retrospective study on extramedullary disease from the Balkan Myeloma Study Group and Barcelona University: analysis of parameters that improve outcome. Haematologica. 2020;105(1):201–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.219295
  18. Moreau P, Attal M, Caillot D, Macro M, Karlin L, Garderet L, et al. Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography at Diagnosis and Before Maintenance Therapy in Symptomatic Patients With Multiple Myeloma Included in the IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Results of the IMAJEM Study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(25):2911–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.72.2975
  19. Batsukh K, Lee SE, Min GJ, Park SS, Jeon YW, Yoon JH, et al. Distinct Clinical Outcomes between Paramedullary and Extramedullary Lesions in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Immune Netw. 2017;17(4):250–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4110/in.2017.17.4.250
  20. Thalambedu N, Kamran M, Al-Hadidi S. The Role of Vertebral Augmentation Procedures in the Management of Multiple Myeloma. Clin Hematol Int. 2024;6(1):51–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.92984
  21. Onggo JR, Maingard JT, Nambiar M, Buckland A, Chandra RV, Hirsch JA. Role of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty in pathological fracture in myeloma: a narrative review. Eur Spine J. 2021;30(10):2825–38. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06955-5
  22. Wickstroem LA, Carreon L, Lund T, Abildgaard N, Lorenzen MD, Andersen MØ. Vertebroplasty in patients with multiple myeloma with vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a single-blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e045854. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045854
  23. Holmes HE, Balian V, Kular S, Batty R, Connolly DJA, Chantry A, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty in multiple myeloma: a tertiary neurosciences experience with long-term follow-up. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1291055. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1291055
  24. Alkhatatba M, Alma'aiteh A, Audat Z, Bani Essa S, Radaideh A, Mohaidat Z, et al. Clinical Outcome of Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy Versus Chemotherapy, Radiation Therapy, and Multilevel Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty for Multiple Myeloma. Orthopedics. 2024;47(4):225–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240325-06
  25. Kyriakou C, Molloy S, Vrionis F, Alberico R, Bastian L, Zonder JA, et al. The role of cement augmentation with percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma: a consensus statement from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG). Blood Cancer J. 2019;9:27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-019-0187-7
  26. Nas ÖF, İnecikli MF, Hacıkurt K, Büyükkaya R, Özkaya G, Özkalemkaş F, et al. Effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with multiple myeloma having vertebral pain. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016;22(3):263–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2016.15201
  27. Yao X, Xu Z, Du X. PKP/PVP combine chemotherapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma patients with vertebral pathological fractures: minimum 3-year follow-up of 108 cases. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1078-0
  28. Fish AM, Kirupaharan P, Scharf ML. An Incidental Finding of Pulmonary Cement Embolism Four Weeks After Vertebroplasty in a 50-Year-Old Man with Multiple Myeloma. Am J Case Rep. 2023;24:e941716. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.941716
  29. Xiang QQ, Chu B, Lu MQ, Shi L, Gao S, Wang YT, et al. Risk-benefit ratio of percutaneous kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with vertebral fracture: a single-center retrospective study. Ann Hematol. 2023;102(6):1513–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-023-05202-9
  30. Zehri AH, Calafiore RL, Peterson KA, Kittel CA, Osei JA, Wilson JL, et al. Surgical management of spinal multiple myeloma: insights from the National Inpatient Sample database. J Spine Surg. 2024;10(3):428–37. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-54
  31. Prandzhev VS, Vezirska DI. Multi-level Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Multiple Spinal Metastases With Asymptomatic Epidural Compression: A Case-Based Example of Minimally Invasive Patient Management. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e72102. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72102

Figures:

Figure 1

Figure 1

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?